Stewart, B. D., von Hippel, W., Radvansky, G. A. (in press). Age, race, and implicit prejudice:  Using process dissociation to separate the underlying components. Psychological Science.

Stewart, B. D., & Payne, B. K. (2008). Bringing automatic stereotyping under control: Implementation intentions as an efficient means of thought control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.

Payne, B. K., & Stewart, B. D. (2007). A process dissociation approach to automaticity and control. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.) Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychology Press.

Weary1, G., Vaughn1, L. A., Stewart1, B. D., & Edwards, J. A. (2006). Adjusting for the correspondence bias: Effects of causal uncertainty, cognitive busyness, and causal strength of situational information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 87-94.                                    1These authors contributed equally to this work.  

Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277-293.

MANUSCRIPTS UNDER REVIEW

MANUSCRIPTS IN PREPARATION

Stewart, B. D. (in preparation). What types of automatic or controlled thinking occur when participants make better decisions when distracted than when not distracted from their deliberation?

Stewart, B. D., & Payne, B. K. (in preparation). Differentiating general intentions and counter-stereotypical implementation intentions as an efficient means of thought control.